In the end, are there any political works in the contemporary artistic production? Does the doctrine of the “free” artist or intellectual, as someone disconnected from the social struggles, survive and become convincing nowadays because of the defeat of radical theories?
When we talk about political art we refer to art, which puts the defeated of the central conflict at its center of interest. But who are these defeated? Are they the eponymous protagonists of history that personify the conflict? The latter are never truly defeated since their action and their archives define the content of the official history. The truly defeated are, in the end, the anonymous. Those for whom defeat has implications, not only for their life, but also for their hope in pushing forward and practically capitalizing on their skills for the benefit of society
The political does not constitute a category that is independent of a particular social reality at a specific place and time. It acquires its real content only through the two-way relationship with the matrix that has given birth to it, triggering painful and annoying questions and ruptures in that specific society. Political art cannot be sterilized by annoying concepts such as moral commitment, social responsibility, solidarity and dignity.